Mandatory Mediation in Common and Civil Law Countries Essay

Mandatory intermediation in Common and Civil Law Countries - Essay ExampleCommon law system countries enjoyment mandatory mediation more prevalently than civil law countries who proceed with considerable caution. The process of litigation is a complex process, which is usually avoided by many people. The civil jurist system in the UK is already exhaust of cases, which have not been fixed because of various legal justifications. This negatively impacts on the involved parties because of the increase in the cost of the various court cases as time elapses. Mediation whoremonger reform the civil justice system of the UK because it ensures there is efficiency in the dispensation of justice. Consequently, savings argon made and time management is upheld.In this respect, the aggrieved parties are satisfied with the mediation dispute resultant roles. The mutual satisfaction of the concerned parties is never achieved in a psychometric test setting. The introduction of mandatory mediatio n in civil cases aims at reducing the backlog of unresolved cases in courts of law. Mandatory mediation is a demonized element in many legal jurisdictions, although it does not affect the spoken communication of justice to the parties in the civil cases. Darbas (2010) asserts that the cost of mandatory intervention justifies the use of this method in the resolution of many cases. It is a better method compared to the trial because in the trial of a case, the judges can give a subjective ruling, which must be accepted. In mandatory mediation cases are resolved in an amicable manner without favor.